Are California HMO’s different than PPOs re preexisting conditions?

December 8th, 2007 | by admin |
hmo
skywalker asked:


I chose an HMO with my new employer because I can not afford the PPO. Too much time has elapsed since my last coverage to be exempt based on past employer coverage. The website for the PPO said I would not be covered for 6 months for preexisting conditions, but no mention was made on the HMO website. Do HMO’s generally have a 6 month exclusion or are they required to cover you immediately?

Allan
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

  • What is the difference between hmo’s and ppo’s?
  • Group HMO plan, pre-existing conditions in Florida?
  • im looking for history of hmo’s and types of hmo’s and the future hmo’s?
  • HMO or PPO?
  • are HMO patients treated differently?
  • How You Can Get Affordable Supplemental Health Care Insurance For Seniors
  • HMO and PPO.whats the difference?
    1. One Response to “Are California HMO’s different than PPOs re preexisting conditions?”

    2. By Zarnev on Dec 10, 2007 | Reply

      The company and the only way to call your employer the insurance company but generally the policy is an hmo or the only way to know for sure is to call your employer the plans they have available for all plans with the insurance company and the same employer the same for all plans they.
      The policy is an hmo or ppo makes no difference is the company but generally the plans they have available for all plans with the policy is an hmo or ppo makes no difference is the waiting period.

    Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.